FlyingPress vs. WP Rocket (2025 Comparison)

Is your WordPress site still slow after optimizing images and themes?
It might be your caching plugin. Caching improves loading time, SEO rankings, and user experience. In 2025, the two most talked-about plugins are FlyingPress and WP Rocket.
Which one is better for speed, features, and value? Let’s break it down.
Want a faster website today? Read on to see which plugin gives you the edge.
What Is WP Rocket?
WP Rocket is one of the oldest and most popular caching plugins. It’s beginner-friendly and packed with performance tools. You install it, activate it, and your site is instantly faster.

You don’t need to know code. WP Rocket automatically configures basic settings to boost page speed. It works well with most themes and plugins, including WooCommerce.
What makes WP Rocket great:
- Instant setup, no complex options
- Includes cache preload and lazy load
- Optimizes CSS, JS, and fonts
- Integrates with most CDN providers
If you’re a beginner, WP Rocket is smooth and simple.
What Is FlyingPress?
FlyingPress is a newer plugin, but it’s built by performance experts. It gives more control, faster loading, and clean output. Developers and speed-obsessed users love it.

Unlike WP Rocket, FlyingPress offers advanced options like WebP delivery, local fonts, and delay scripts with precision. It’s not hard to use, but more detailed.
Why users love FlyingPress:
- Built-in lazy load, font display control
- Supports self-hosted fonts and Google Fonts fallback
- Image optimization with WebP and AVIF
- Delays JavaScript more precisely
Want full control over how your site loads? FlyingPress is for you.
Speed Test Results (Real Example)
To compare fairly, we installed both plugins on the same WordPress site with the Astra theme, dummy content, and no CDN.
FlyingPress Setup:
After tweaking settings and enabling lazy loading, the homepage loaded in 0.85 seconds. Google PageSpeed score was 98 on mobile.
WP Rocket Setup:
With default options, page loaded in 1.15 seconds. Mobile score was 91 with similar features active.
Real-world case:
- FlyingPress: 0.85s, mobile score 98
- WP Rocket: 1.15s, mobile score 91
- FlyingPress had cleaner CLS and LCP
- Both passed Core Web Vitals
Need blazing speed and better Core Web Vitals? FlyingPress wins on performance.
Features Breakdown
Let’s explore each plugin’s main features more clearly, so you can decide which best fits your needs.
WP Rocket Features Explained:
- Page Caching: WP Rocket creates static HTML files of your pages, so they load faster for visitors.
- Cache Preloading: It automatically builds the cache when you make changes, ensuring visitors get the fastest version.
- Lazy Load: WP Rocket delays loading images and videos until the user scrolls, improving initial load time.
- Database Optimization: You can clean post revisions, spam comments, and overhead directly from the dashboard.
- Delay JavaScript Execution: WP Rocket can delay non-critical JS scripts to speed up page rendering.
- GZIP Compression: It compresses your files to reduce their size before loading them in the browser.
FlyingPress Features Explained:
- Full Page Caching: Generates fast-loading static HTML pages with smart cache invalidation.
- Font Optimization: Preloads and self-hosts fonts for faster text rendering, including fallback for Google Fonts.
- Image Optimization: Compresses and serves images in modern formats like WebP and AVIF, with lazy load and responsive sizing.
- JavaScript Delay & Execution: Allows precision control to delay specific scripts only when needed, avoiding layout shifts.
- Remove Unused CSS: Scans and removes CSS that’s not used on a page, reducing file size dramatically.
- Built-in CDN Support: Integrates easily with BunnyCDN, Cloudflare, and others for global asset delivery.
Want a caching plugin that goes beyond basics? FlyingPress offers deeper, developer-grade optimization.
Pricing Comparison (2025)
Let’s compare pricing and licenses for both plugins. Note: both offer 1-year support and updates.
FlyingPress Pricing:
- Personal: $60/year for 1 site
- Developer: $150/year for 5 sites
- Agency: $250/year for 50 sites
WP Rocket Pricing:
- Single: $59/year for 1 site
- Plus: $119/year for 3 sites
- Infinite: $299/year for unlimited sites
Key notes:
- WP Rocket is easier for multi-site scaling
- FlyingPress has fewer limits on features across plans
- FlyingPress includes image optimizations by default
- WP Rocket depends on extra tools for compression
For a single site, both are similar in cost. For developers, FlyingPress gives more per dollar.
Ease of Use & Interface
WP Rocket is easier for beginners. You can install and forget it. Most settings are toggled with one click. It’s perfect for users who don’t want to tinker.
FlyingPress is still user-friendly but offers more granular controls. Each section is clean and clearly labeled. Advanced users will appreciate the depth.
Comparison highlights:
- WP Rocket = plug-and-play
- FlyingPress = tweak-and-optimize
- WP Rocket hides advanced options
- FlyingPress gives full control without clutter
Want quick results? WP Rocket is easier. Want maximum performance? Go with FlyingPress.
Support & Community
Both plugins offer solid documentation and fast support. FlyingPress has a smaller but growing user base. WP Rocket has been around longer with more tutorials and community help.
FlyingPress Support:
- Email support, fast replies
- Developer-led updates and roadmap
- Detailed documentation
WP Rocket Support:
- Email + extensive help center
- Big user base and video tutorials
- Trusted by large hosting providers
Need peace of mind and fast help? WP Rocket has wider support reach. FlyingPress is catching up quickly.
Rocket Pros and Cons
Features | FlyingPress ✅ | WP Rocket ✅ |
---|---|---|
Performance | Faster, better Core Web Vitals | Good, but slightly slower |
Ease of Use | Requires more setup | Beginner-friendly |
Optimizations | Advanced (lazy loading, script delaying) | Standard caching & optimizations |
Compatibility | Works with any host | Better plugin/theme compatibility |
Pricing | More expensive | More affordable |
Support & Updates | Decent, but not as frequent | Strong support & frequent updates |
Free Version | ❌ No | ❌ No |
Winner: FlyingPress or WP Rocket?
Choose FlyingPress if:
- You want better speed scores and performance
- You prefer more control over optimizations
- You need built-in font and image delivery features
- You’re comfortable exploring advanced settings
Choose WP Rocket if:
- You want a simple install-and-go solution
- You manage client sites and need scalability
- You prefer a widely trusted plugin with broad support
- You don’t need granular controls
If performance matters most, FlyingPress is the winner in 2025.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best WordPress caching plugin?
WP Rocket, LiteSpeed Cache, or W3 Total Cache.
Which is better, WP Rocket or LiteSpeed cache?
LiteSpeed Cache is better for LiteSpeed servers; WP Rocket is great for all hosts.
What is better than WP Rocket?
LiteSpeed Cache (on LiteSpeed servers), FlyingPress, or Cache Enabler.
Is LiteSpeed cache the best?
Yes, for LiteSpeed servers. Otherwise, WP Rocket or FlyingPress are great.
Is FlyingPress better than WP Rocket?
In terms of performance and customization, yes. FlyingPress offers better control and speed in 2025.
Is FlyingPress beginner-friendly?
Yes. While it offers more control, the UI is clean and easy to use with helpful tooltips.
Can I use both WP Rocket and FlyingPress together?
No. Using both can cause conflicts. Choose one plugin for caching and optimization.
Which plugin is better for Core Web Vitals?
FlyingPress generally performs better with LCP, CLS, and Total Blocking Time improvements.